<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title>Dividends on LibreLeo: Financial Freedom for Globally Mobile Investors</title><link>https://libreleo.com/tags/dividends/</link><description>Tools, math, and lived experience for expats building wealth across borders. Passive portfolios and active income from a Dubai-based trader.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Copyright © 2026 | All rights reserved</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://libreleo.com/tags/dividends/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why I Don't Chase Dividends (And What I Do Instead)</title><link>https://libreleo.com/posts/why-i-dont-chase-dividends/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://libreleo.com/posts/why-i-dont-chase-dividends/</guid><description>I'm not anti-dividend. I just think most investors chase yield without realising what they're trading away. Here's how I think about it, and what I actually do with my own money.</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="lead text-neutral-500 dark:text-neutral-400 !mb-9 text-xl">
  I'm not against dividends. I own stocks that pay them. What I'm against is <em>chasing</em> them. Picking investments by yield instead of by what the money is actually doing for you.
</div>

<p>A dividend is just a company sending you cash. That's fine. The problem starts when &quot;high yield&quot; becomes the only filter. When an investor screens for 6%, 8%, 10% payouts and assumes that's the same thing as a &quot;good investment.&quot;</p>
<p>It isn't. And the gap between those two ideas is where a lot of people quietly lose money.</p>
<p>This post is me thinking out loud about why I personally don't optimize for dividends, what the actual trade-offs are, and what I do instead. If you read it and decide dividend investing is still right for you, then go ahead. I just want you to make that choice with both eyes open.</p>
<hr>

<h2 class="relative group">The One Mistake That Hides Behind Everything
    <div id="the-one-mistake-that-hides-behind-everything" class="anchor"></div>
    
    <span
        class="absolute top-0 w-6 transition-opacity opacity-0 -start-6 not-prose group-hover:opacity-100 select-none">
        <a class="text-primary-300 dark:text-neutral-700 !no-underline" href="#the-one-mistake-that-hides-behind-everything" aria-label="Anchor">#</a>
    </span>
    
</h2>
<p>People treat <strong>dividend yield</strong> and <strong>return on investment</strong> as if they were the same number. They're not.</p>
<p>The return on a stock is made of two pieces:</p>
<pre class="not-prose mermaid">
flowchart TD
    A[Total Return] --> B[Capital Appreciation<br/>price goes up]
    A --> C[Dividend Yield<br/>cash paid out]
    B --> D[Compounds inside<br/>the business]
    C --> E[Cash in your hand<br/>or reinvested]
</pre>

<p>If a stock pays a 4% dividend and the share price drops 4% on the ex-dividend date, your total return that day is <em>zero</em>. The company didn't manufacture wealth out of thin air. It just moved value from one pocket (share price) to another pocket (your cash account). And in many jurisdictions, that move triggers tax along the way.</p>
<p>That's the lens I want you to keep in mind for the rest of this post. Total return is the real number. Everything else is bookkeeping.</p>
<div class="admonition relative overflow-hidden rounded-lg border-l-4 my-3 px-4 py-3 shadow-sm" data-type="tip">
      <div class="flex items-center gap-2 font-semibold text-inherit">
        <div class="flex shrink-0 h-5 w-5 items-center justify-center text-lg"><span class="relative block icon"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 384 512"><path fill="currentColor" d="M112.1 454.3c0 6.297 1.816 12.44 5.284 17.69l17.14 25.69c5.25 7.875 17.17 14.28 26.64 14.28h61.67c9.438 0 21.36-6.401 26.61-14.28l17.08-25.68c2.938-4.438 5.348-12.37 5.348-17.7L272 415.1h-160L112.1 454.3zM191.4 .0132C89.44 .3257 16 82.97 16 175.1c0 44.38 16.44 84.84 43.56 115.8c16.53 18.84 42.34 58.23 52.22 91.45c.0313 .25 .0938 .5166 .125 .7823h160.2c.0313-.2656 .0938-.5166 .125-.7823c9.875-33.22 35.69-72.61 52.22-91.45C351.6 260.8 368 220.4 368 175.1C368 78.61 288.9-.2837 191.4 .0132zM192 96.01c-44.13 0-80 35.89-80 79.1C112 184.8 104.8 192 96 192S80 184.8 80 176c0-61.76 50.25-111.1 112-111.1c8.844 0 16 7.159 16 16S200.8 96.01 192 96.01z"/></svg>
</span></div>
        <div class="grow">
          Tip
        </div>
      </div><div class="admonition-content mt-3 text-base leading-relaxed text-inherit"><p>Before you buy something for the dividend, ask yourself: &quot;Would I still want this if it paid zero and the price grew at the same total rate?&quot; If the answer is no, you're not investing. You are paying a premium for cash flow.</p></div></div><hr>

<h2 class="relative group">Six Reasons I Personally Skip the Dividend Chase
    <div id="six-reasons-i-personally-skip-the-dividend-chase" class="anchor"></div>
    
    <span
        class="absolute top-0 w-6 transition-opacity opacity-0 -start-6 not-prose group-hover:opacity-100 select-none">
        <a class="text-primary-300 dark:text-neutral-700 !no-underline" href="#six-reasons-i-personally-skip-the-dividend-chase" aria-label="Anchor">#</a>
    </span>
    
</h2>
<p>I've consolidated the classic eight reasons into six that I actually believe matter the most. The other two (&quot;preference&quot; and &quot;no guarantee&quot;) are true but trivial. They apply to literally every investment.</p>

<h3 class="relative group">1. Dividends Are Not Free Money
    <div id="1-dividends-are-not-free-money" class="anchor"></div>
    
    <span
        class="absolute top-0 w-6 transition-opacity opacity-0 -start-6 not-prose group-hover:opacity-100 select-none">
        <a class="text-primary-300 dark:text-neutral-700 !no-underline" href="#1-dividends-are-not-free-money" aria-label="Anchor">#</a>
    </span>
    
</h3>
<p>This is the one most people get wrong. A dividend isn't a bonus. It's <em>your</em> money being transferred from the company's balance sheet to yours. On payday, the share price drops by roughly the dividend amount. You haven't been given anything. You have been handed a slice of what you already owned, in cash form.</p>
<p>If the company could have reinvested that cash at a high rate of return, you may have just received the <em>worst</em> outcome: paying tax to receive money the business could have grown for you.</p>

<h3 class="relative group">2. They Can Cap Your Total Return
    <div id="2-they-can-cap-your-total-return" class="anchor"></div>
    
    <span
        class="absolute top-0 w-6 transition-opacity opacity-0 -start-6 not-prose group-hover:opacity-100 select-none">
        <a class="text-primary-300 dark:text-neutral-700 !no-underline" href="#2-they-can-cap-your-total-return" aria-label="Anchor">#</a>
    </span>
    
</h3>
<p>The best long-term performers in market history such as Amazon, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, Microsoft for most of its growth phase,  paid little or no dividend for years. They retained earnings and compounded inside the business.</p>
<p>A 5% dividend yield sounds nice. But if it comes with 1% earnings growth, you're earning 6% total. A no-dividend growth stock compounding at 11% is way better over a decade. Yield is a number you can see. Compounding is a number you have to imagine. Most people choose the one they can see.</p>

<h3 class="relative group">3. They Create a Tax Drag You Didn't Ask For
    <div id="3-they-create-a-tax-drag-you-didnt-ask-for" class="anchor"></div>
    
    <span
        class="absolute top-0 w-6 transition-opacity opacity-0 -start-6 not-prose group-hover:opacity-100 select-none">
        <a class="text-primary-300 dark:text-neutral-700 !no-underline" href="#3-they-create-a-tax-drag-you-didnt-ask-for" aria-label="Anchor">#</a>
    </span>
    
</h3>
<p>Tax rules vary wildly by country, but the principle is universal: a dividend is usually a <strong>taxable event</strong> the moment it lands. Capital appreciation isn't taxed until you sell.</p>
<p>That means a portfolio of growth stocks lets you defer tax for years, even decades, while compounding pre-tax. A high-yield portfolio forces you to pay every quarter. Even if the rate is identical, paying later beats paying now.</p>
<p>I own Swiss and US Stocks. My dividend payments are always gross minus the withholding tax. Switzerlands withholding tax is 35% and US withholding tax is 30%. If you live abroad like myself, you can claim back some of the withholding tax, but that comes at a huge hassle. Lot's of paperwork and some upfront costs.</p>

  
  
  
  



<div
  
    class="flex px-4 py-3 rounded-md shadow bg-primary-100 dark:bg-primary-900"
  
  >
  <span
    
      class="text-primary-400 pe-3 flex items-center"
    
    >
    <span class="relative block icon"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 512 512"><path fill="currentColor" d="M256 0C114.6 0 0 114.6 0 256s114.6 256 256 256s256-114.6 256-256S397.4 0 256 0zM256 128c17.67 0 32 14.33 32 32c0 17.67-14.33 32-32 32S224 177.7 224 160C224 142.3 238.3 128 256 128zM296 384h-80C202.8 384 192 373.3 192 360s10.75-24 24-24h16v-64H224c-13.25 0-24-10.75-24-24S210.8 224 224 224h32c13.25 0 24 10.75 24 24v88h16c13.25 0 24 10.75 24 24S309.3 384 296 384z"/></svg>
</span>
  </span>

  <span
    
      class="dark:text-neutral-300"
    
    >Some countries treat dividends very favourably (qualified rates, etc.). Others tax them as ordinary income. Check your local rules before assuming this point applies. But in most cases, dividends are the <em>less</em> tax-efficient option.</span>
</div>


<h3 class="relative group">4. They're a Forced Withdrawal You Don't Control
    <div id="4-theyre-a-forced-withdrawal-you-dont-control" class="anchor"></div>
    
    <span
        class="absolute top-0 w-6 transition-opacity opacity-0 -start-6 not-prose group-hover:opacity-100 select-none">
        <a class="text-primary-300 dark:text-neutral-700 !no-underline" href="#4-theyre-a-forced-withdrawal-you-dont-control" aria-label="Anchor">#</a>
    </span>
    
</h3>
<p>When you own a growth stock, <em>you</em> decide when to take money out. You can sell a portion when you need cash, or never.</p>
<p>When you own a dividend stock, the company decides for you. They pay out on their schedule, in their amounts, whether or not you wanted the cash. If you're still in the accumulation phase and you reinvest the dividend, you've just done a manual round-trip. Receive cash, pay tax (maybe), buy shares back.</p>

<h3 class="relative group">5. They Push You Toward a Less Diversified Portfolio
    <div id="5-they-push-you-toward-a-less-diversified-portfolio" class="anchor"></div>
    
    <span
        class="absolute top-0 w-6 transition-opacity opacity-0 -start-6 not-prose group-hover:opacity-100 select-none">
        <a class="text-primary-300 dark:text-neutral-700 !no-underline" href="#5-they-push-you-toward-a-less-diversified-portfolio" aria-label="Anchor">#</a>
    </span>
    
</h3>
<p>Screen the market for high yield and you end up in the same three sectors every time: utilities, financials, energy, sometimes REITs and telcos. That's not a diversified portfolio.</p>
<p>When those sectors hit a bad cycle such as rates rise, oil collapses, banks get squeezed, your &quot;safe&quot; income portfolio falls 30%.</p>

<h3 class="relative group">6. The Psychological Win Disguises a Financial Loss
    <div id="6-the-psychological-win-disguises-a-financial-loss" class="anchor"></div>
    
    <span
        class="absolute top-0 w-6 transition-opacity opacity-0 -start-6 not-prose group-hover:opacity-100 select-none">
        <a class="text-primary-300 dark:text-neutral-700 !no-underline" href="#6-the-psychological-win-disguises-a-financial-loss" aria-label="Anchor">#</a>
    </span>
    
</h3>
<p>This one is the most personal. Getting a dividend <em>feels</em> great. Cash hits the account, you see the number and your brain registers it as a win. That feeling is real. But it's only a feeling, not a return.</p>
<p>Some investors hold onto declining dividend stocks far past the point where the math made sense, simply because the quarterly payout felt like proof the position was working. It wasn't working. The payout was just emotionally louder than the unrealized loss on the share price. I've experienced it myself.</p>
<hr>

<h2 class="relative group">What I Actually Do Instead
    <div id="what-i-actually-do-instead" class="anchor"></div>
    
    <span
        class="absolute top-0 w-6 transition-opacity opacity-0 -start-6 not-prose group-hover:opacity-100 select-none">
        <a class="text-primary-300 dark:text-neutral-700 !no-underline" href="#what-i-actually-do-instead" aria-label="Anchor">#</a>
    </span>
    
</h2>
<p>Here's how I structure my own approach:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Total return is the only number that matters.</strong> I look at &quot;how much will this position be worth in ten years, including everything?&quot;</li>
<li><strong>I let growth compound where it makes sense.</strong> A position that retains earnings well and reinvests them at a high return is doing my job for me. I don't need it to send me cash.</li>
<li><strong>I generate my income from options, not yield.</strong> Selling defined-risk options premium gives me cash flow that <em>I</em> control, with <em>defined</em> risk, on positions I already wanted to own. That's a different game than waiting for a board to declare a dividend. This is why I trade options for income rather than buy yield.</li>
<li><strong>When I do own dividend payers, it's because the underlying business is great</strong>, not because the yield is high. The dividend is the side-effect.</li>
</ol>
<hr>

<h2 class="relative group">Who Should Actually Lean Into Dividends
    <div id="who-should-actually-lean-into-dividends" class="anchor"></div>
    
    <span
        class="absolute top-0 w-6 transition-opacity opacity-0 -start-6 not-prose group-hover:opacity-100 select-none">
        <a class="text-primary-300 dark:text-neutral-700 !no-underline" href="#who-should-actually-lean-into-dividends" aria-label="Anchor">#</a>
    </span>
    
</h2>
<p>I don't want to be one-sided. There are real scenarios where a dividend-heavy approach makes sense:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>You're in or near retirement</strong> and you want predictable cash flow without the psychological pressure of selling shares in a down market.</li>
<li><strong>You live in a jurisdiction with very favourable dividend taxation</strong></li>
<li><strong>You know yourself well enough to admit</strong> you'll panic-sell growth stocks in a 40% drawdown but you'll happily hold a utility paying you 5% through the same drop.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you're in any of those buckets, dividend investing isn't a mistake. It's the right tool for your situation.</p>
<hr>

<h2 class="relative group">The Bottom Line
    <div id="the-bottom-line" class="anchor"></div>
    
    <span
        class="absolute top-0 w-6 transition-opacity opacity-0 -start-6 not-prose group-hover:opacity-100 select-none">
        <a class="text-primary-300 dark:text-neutral-700 !no-underline" href="#the-bottom-line" aria-label="Anchor">#</a>
    </span>
    
</h2>
<p>I'm not anti-dividend. I'm anti-<em>chase</em>.</p>
<p>The mistake isn't owning companies that pay you cash. The mistake is letting &quot;yield&quot; become a shortcut that bypasses every other question worth asking: Is this a good business? Am I diversified? Am I optimizing for total return or for the feeling of being paid? Is there a better way to generate the cash flow I actually want?</p>
<p>For me, the answer to that last question is yes.  I would rather build income on my own terms, with options I control, on businesses I'd own anyway. For you, it might be different. That's fine. But think about it.</p>

  
  
  
  



<div
  
    class="flex px-4 py-3 rounded-md shadow bg-primary-100 dark:bg-primary-900"
  
  >
  <span
    
      class="text-primary-400 pe-3 flex items-center"
    
    >
    <span class="relative block icon"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 512 512"><path fill="currentColor" d="M256 0C114.6 0 0 114.6 0 256s114.6 256 256 256s256-114.6 256-256S397.4 0 256 0zM256 128c17.67 0 32 14.33 32 32c0 17.67-14.33 32-32 32S224 177.7 224 160C224 142.3 238.3 128 256 128zM296 384h-80C202.8 384 192 373.3 192 360s10.75-24 24-24h16v-64H224c-13.25 0-24-10.75-24-24S210.8 224 224 224h32c13.25 0 24 10.75 24 24v88h16c13.25 0 24 10.75 24 24S309.3 384 296 384z"/></svg>
</span>
  </span>

  <span
    
      class="dark:text-neutral-300"
    
    ><strong>Disclaimer:</strong> This post reflects my personal views and is for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Every situation is different. Always check your country's specific tax and investment rules before acting. See the full <a href="/disclaimer/" >Disclaimer</a> and <a href="/privacy/" >Privacy Policy</a> for the long version.</span>
</div>

]]></content:encoded><media:content url="https://libreleo.com/img/featured/why-i-dont-chase-dividends.webp" medium="image"/></item></channel></rss>